Film Reviews: Batman Begins & The Dark Knight


Christopher Nolan‘s Batman films are among the best, if not the best, of the superhero films out there. Iron Man is excellent, I really enjoyed the Spider-Man films (even the third one), and I thought that The Incredible Hulk was well-written and emotional. However, none of the installments in this new generation of superhero films hold a candle to the Batman duo (soon to be trilogy), comprised of Batman Begins and The Dark Knight.

While only The Dark Knight is on the Top 100 Modern Classics list (and rightly so, for raising the issues discussed below), I believe that the two films should be viewed as a unit, two parts of one story (to be concluded with the third installment of the trilogy), much like The Lord of the Rings. Because I believe that most people have seen these movies, I’ll dispense with a traditional synopsis.

One of the prevalent themes of this series is corruption in society, and that people must make a stand against it. It can certainly be broken down into good vs. evil, right vs. wrong, but most definitely morality despite all social constraints.

In Batman Begins, the League of Shadows’ purpose is to restore society to its normal level, much like a slash and burn, where a field is given a burst of fertilizing nutrients upon burning. However, what man can claim moral superiority to dictate this on a societal level? Batman, though he realizes that society is inherently base and depraved, remains determined to save it at all costs.

The question remains, however, do the ends justify the means? What does Batman stand for? He seeks to uphold justice, yet he goes outside the law to do so. Does this not lead to some form of chaos? Batman Begins is the story of Bruce Wayne learning to see beyond his own anger and taking a stand for what is right.

The Dark Knight begins shortly after its predecessor, with the introduction of the Joker. Not too long ago, I had a conversation with some friends about what this film was all about (and I hope they further this discussion below), but I believe that Joker represents chaos, but oddly, chaos with a purpose. He seeks to demonstrate what Batman stands for. Who is he and why?

He acts as a foil to Batman; he seeks to show that Batman is merely mortal, no better than any one man. He continues to put Batman and the citizens of Gotham into morally ambiguous situations to break them down. He’s not in it for money, but for anarchy, to deconstruct established constructs.

“It’s not about the money. It’s about sending a message.”

“Some people just want to watch the world burn.”

“The only sensible way to live in this world is without rules.”

Even more, the Joker desires to take the symbol of all that is good in society–Harvey Dent–down to the level of everyone else, to show that he is capable of evil.

Even though Dent breaks, there are those who remain upstanding–Lucius Fox, Alfred, Lieutenant Gordon. They remain, for the most part, within the law. So, is it right or wrong for Batman to do what he does? Should he remain within the law? Do man-made laws supersede morality? Do they define morality? Or are there moral absolutes that must be upheld regardless of what society deems proper?

In the end, Batman becomes a Christ figure who must do what is right, taking the sins of mankind upon himself, becoming their scapegoat in order to redeem them.

I love these films and I cannot wait for the third and final installment from the brilliance that is Christopher Nolan.

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “Film Reviews: Batman Begins & The Dark Knight

  1. I think I could talk about these films all week long and still have more to say. The Joker is definitely an agent of chaos, though he is not totally chaotic. To be that, he couldn’t have done all the planning he did to put Batman repeatedly in the position to make hard moral decisions. I agree that he’s crucial in defining who Batman is. I think he is also important in proving that there is outright evil out there. “Some people just want to watch the world burn” is something only the truly evil would want. Not all bad guys are morally ambiguous people who were abused as kids and ‘couldn’t help what they became.’ People like that are foot soldiers for the most part.

    There seems to be a harder decision involved for those that choose to commit the more depraved acts. That’s why I liked the Long Halloween telling of Harvey Dent’s descent into Two Face (and what Dark Knight didn’t/couldn’t give enough time to). You can see him flip, see him make the decision.

    I like the term anarchist for the Joker. Anarchists intentionally destabilize society in a calculated way in which true chaos cannot “”Remember, remember the 5th of November, the Gunpowder and Treason Plot..”). Anarchy tears down ideals and forces the examination of our own moral inconsistencies. (To an extent there’s an underlying question here: are morals only good if they’re 100% consistent?)

    Totally agree that Batman is the best of the superhero films. The others feel more like the fun flicks they are, whereas Batman gets into some hardcore ideology while still remaining high on the awesome meter for action films. I like it that the Nolans are willing to write to an intelligent audience.

    Also agree that the films should be taken together. I don’t think Dark Knight makes quite as much sense without the context of Begins. It needs the mythology of rising from ashes to ground Bruce/Batman in DK since we really don’t see enough of him to have that in DK alone.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s